<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Digital SLR Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalslrreviews.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net</link>
	<description>Digital SLR Reviews to keep you up to date</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Is it ok to take my Nikon digital SLR to Rialto theater in tucson? by Johnny Utah</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/nikon-digital-slr/is-it-ok-to-take-my-nikon-digital-slr-to-rialto-theater-in-tucson#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Utah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/nikon-digital-slr/is-it-ok-to-take-my-nikon-digital-slr-to-rialto-theater-in-tucson#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>been there a few times and i know when i saw dillinger escape plan, zao, a life once lost, unearth they wouldnt let you.  i guess as long as they dont see it theres no harm done.  i got into a fight at that venue.  :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>been there a few times and i know when i saw dillinger escape plan, zao, a life once lost, unearth they wouldnt let you.  i guess as long as they dont see it theres no harm done.  i got into a fight at that venue.  <img src='http://digitalslrreviews.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> <br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buying my first Digital SLR? by Sandy</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>I would recommend you Nikon D3000 Digital SLR Camera 
10.2megapixel CCD sensor,11-point autofocus system, Fast response,Guide mode,3-inch TFT, 3 fps continuous shooting allows you to capture fast-moving action at 3 frames per second
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=bestdeals-y-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=390957&#38;creativeASIN=B002JCSV5I&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend you Nikon D3000 Digital SLR Camera <br />
10.2megapixel CCD sensor,11-point autofocus system, Fast response,Guide mode,3-inch TFT, 3 fps continuous shooting allows you to capture fast-moving action at 3 frames per second<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=bestdeals-y-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002JCSV5I" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=bestdeals-y-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002JCSV5I</a><br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buying my first Digital SLR? by Barnaby Nerberka</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Nerberka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>If you are a beginner to DSLR cameras, or upgrading from a point and shoot I would recommend a D3000, as it's a good, low price entry level DSLR with a great guide mode, a great feature for the beginner DSLR user. But the D5000 is a great advanced consumer DSLR, with a good HD movie recording function. Check them both out, and choose which suits your needs. Also have a look at the top of the consumer range D90.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a beginner to DSLR cameras, or upgrading from a point and shoot I would recommend a D3000, as it&#8217;s a good, low price entry level DSLR with a great guide mode, a great feature for the beginner DSLR user. But the D5000 is a great advanced consumer DSLR, with a good HD movie recording function. Check them both out, and choose which suits your needs. Also have a look at the top of the consumer range D90.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buying my first Digital SLR? by BL</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>BL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>For you budget Nikon D3000 is a good choice. It does not have live view but come with 11-point Auto focus, fast and accurate auto focus provide razor-sharp pictures.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=computer0bd-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=390957&#38;creativeASIN=B002JCSV5I&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you budget Nikon D3000 is a good choice. It does not have live view but come with 11-point Auto focus, fast and accurate auto focus provide razor-sharp pictures.<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002JCSV5I" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002JCSV5I</a><br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buying my first Digital SLR? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>if i were you i would get the one below.

Canon Rebel XS 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens
10.1-megapixel CMOS sensor captures enough detail for poster-size, photo-quality prints
Large 2.5-inch LCD display; includes Canon's EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens
DIGIC III image processor provides fast, accurate image processing; Live View Function
EOS Integrated Cleaning system and Canon-designed Self Cleaning Sensor Unit, plus Dust Delete Data Detection in included software
Stores images on SD/SDHC memory cards
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CBKJGG?tag=dcmb-20

Review: I spent several weeks reviewing the REBEL XS vs it's many 10 MP adversaries, I even checked it against the ultra zooms as I wanted the convenience of video as well, but too many good things stood out with this camera and so I decided upon it. I bought the rebel XS and after days of dirt testing this camera I've found it a beautiful experience. 
Now I'm a professional videographer attached to a tv station in Trinidad &#38; Tobago, my purpose for this camera was the need for a quick sharp still shot camera that would be impressive under low light and still capture impressive portrait shots to be used for my website and for large prints. I didn't want to shell out over a $1000. US for a camera body. 
What is tagged by Canon is true: The full auto mode is truly accurate and gives excellent shots always, it makes photography so easy for a beginner or intermediate. The portrait mode isn't blurry, images are clean, nicely toned, excellent in quality for large size prints. The P ( program mode) I like alot at first because this mode sets exposure so nicely I found it addictive. I shot alot of night pics of cars on a freeway, with bright, sharp, lively colours emerging. Night pics at 800 iso had very very very little noise, and I mean I was searching the pics on 15&#34; monitors for reason to complain, but was really impressed. 
The auto focus is really quick. Th XS comes with &#34;only&#34; a 7 point auto focus system compared to the XSi 9 point, forgive me when I say there may be no need for another 2 points when the camera focusses so quick and so accurately. I have not gotten a soft image when shot with the auto focus operating. 
Now for those point and shoot cams that boast about &#34;face detection&#34;....5 faces...6,7, some even 15. I also have a 10 mp ultra zoom, this simply matters little if not at all, if the focussing ability of the camera is poor or average, and given the &#34;average lens&#34; quality they're made of. 
I have learnt clearly that a 10 MP ultra zoom simply cannot compare to a 10 MP D SLR...chalk and cheese. 
I also bought the Tamron 70mm - 300mm, F4-5.6 telephoto/ macro lens. No vignetting at either end of the lens. 
Auto iso is simply magnificent, have not taken a shot where the camera over estimated or underestimated the iso levels. 
The Manual mode of this camera is the most impressive for me. The rebel XS via various magazine testing has come up faster than it's other 10 MP rivals when it comes to fps shooting, and burst images. It really does shoot 3 fps consistently, it shoots 2.3 fps in low light, worst case is over 1 fps all at 10 MP quality. 
I haven't used a lower quality since, given I bought a Transcend 8GB SDHC card storage is not an issue. 
Most of my shooting has been at night, for the little done in daylight, it has been amazing. Colours are very bright, depth of field very very nice. Macros works well. Image optimizer simply shocked life out of me. I was in a shaded area and without flash it really improves the subject without over blowing the background, stuff that is almost impossible on point and shoot cams. 

Stuff I disagree with from the &#34;reviews&#34; : 1- &#34;The camera feels cheaply built&#34;....simply wrong, nothing is shabby, buttons are actually easy to press, doesn't have cheap clicks to them, the lens mount has a secure feel to it, and a proper snap when it is set. Battery compartment is certainly secure. Your finger must intricately open the door for entry, won't be an accident issue. Rubber door at a.v. ports snap in well. Rubber grip is firm enough, smooth enough to not irritate your hands. 
2- &#34; XS is &#34;overpriced&#34; compared to the XSi.....Xsi shoots slower than the XS, XSi picture quality is equal to the XS even though the XSi is 12 MP. The XSi may be the 3&#34; LCD and a few other upgrades, but these upgrades don't add up when the picture is taken and the quality of both cameras match alike. I may have chosen the XSI if I wanted to spend the extra $150. u.s but for the lesser price, I'm yet to regret. 
3- &#34;The XS &#34;only has a 2.5&#34; LCD compared to a couple of it's rivals having 3&#34; LCD's&#34;. I can see every thing clearly with this screen, even with Histograms, and grids onscreen. If LCD's get much bigger then canon may need to install a tv tuner as well....the 2.5&#34; is more than sufficient. 
4- &#34;The XS doesn't have SPOT METERING compared to the XSi, so this is a big issue&#34;- haven't encountered a r&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CBKJGG?tag=dcmb-20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i were you i would get the one below.</p>
<p>Canon Rebel XS 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens<br />
10.1-megapixel CMOS sensor captures enough detail for poster-size, photo-quality prints<br />
Large 2.5-inch LCD display; includes Canon&#8217;s EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens<br />
DIGIC III image processor provides fast, accurate image processing; Live View Function<br />
EOS Integrated Cleaning system and Canon-designed Self Cleaning Sensor Unit, plus Dust Delete Data Detection in included software<br />
Stores images on SD/SDHC memory cards<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CBKJGG?tag=dcmb-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CBKJGG?tag=dcmb-20</a></p>
<p>Review: I spent several weeks reviewing the REBEL XS vs it&#8217;s many 10 MP adversaries, I even checked it against the ultra zooms as I wanted the convenience of video as well, but too many good things stood out with this camera and so I decided upon it. I bought the rebel XS and after days of dirt testing this camera I&#8217;ve found it a beautiful experience.<br />
Now I&#8217;m a professional videographer attached to a tv station in Trinidad &amp; Tobago, my purpose for this camera was the need for a quick sharp still shot camera that would be impressive under low light and still capture impressive portrait shots to be used for my website and for large prints. I didn&#8217;t want to shell out over a $1000. US for a camera body.<br />
What is tagged by Canon is true: The full auto mode is truly accurate and gives excellent shots always, it makes photography so easy for a beginner or intermediate. The portrait mode isn&#8217;t blurry, images are clean, nicely toned, excellent in quality for large size prints. The P ( program mode) I like alot at first because this mode sets exposure so nicely I found it addictive. I shot alot of night pics of cars on a freeway, with bright, sharp, lively colours emerging. Night pics at 800 iso had very very very little noise, and I mean I was searching the pics on 15&quot; monitors for reason to complain, but was really impressed.<br />
The auto focus is really quick. Th XS comes with &quot;only&quot; a 7 point auto focus system compared to the XSi 9 point, forgive me when I say there may be no need for another 2 points when the camera focusses so quick and so accurately. I have not gotten a soft image when shot with the auto focus operating.<br />
Now for those point and shoot cams that boast about &quot;face detection&quot;&#8230;.5 faces&#8230;6,7, some even 15. I also have a 10 mp ultra zoom, this simply matters little if not at all, if the focussing ability of the camera is poor or average, and given the &quot;average lens&quot; quality they&#8217;re made of.<br />
I have learnt clearly that a 10 MP ultra zoom simply cannot compare to a 10 MP D SLR&#8230;chalk and cheese.<br />
I also bought the Tamron 70mm - 300mm, F4-5.6 telephoto/ macro lens. No vignetting at either end of the lens.<br />
Auto iso is simply magnificent, have not taken a shot where the camera over estimated or underestimated the iso levels.<br />
The Manual mode of this camera is the most impressive for me. The rebel XS via various magazine testing has come up faster than it&#8217;s other 10 MP rivals when it comes to fps shooting, and burst images. It really does shoot 3 fps consistently, it shoots 2.3 fps in low light, worst case is over 1 fps all at 10 MP quality.<br />
I haven&#8217;t used a lower quality since, given I bought a Transcend 8GB SDHC card storage is not an issue.<br />
Most of my shooting has been at night, for the little done in daylight, it has been amazing. Colours are very bright, depth of field very very nice. Macros works well. Image optimizer simply shocked life out of me. I was in a shaded area and without flash it really improves the subject without over blowing the background, stuff that is almost impossible on point and shoot cams. </p>
<p>Stuff I disagree with from the &quot;reviews&quot; : 1- &quot;The camera feels cheaply built&quot;&#8230;.simply wrong, nothing is shabby, buttons are actually easy to press, doesn&#8217;t have cheap clicks to them, the lens mount has a secure feel to it, and a proper snap when it is set. Battery compartment is certainly secure. Your finger must intricately open the door for entry, won&#8217;t be an accident issue. Rubber door at a.v. ports snap in well. Rubber grip is firm enough, smooth enough to not irritate your hands.<br />
2- &quot; XS is &quot;overpriced&quot; compared to the XSi&#8230;..Xsi shoots slower than the XS, XSi picture quality is equal to the XS even though the XSi is 12 MP. The XSi may be the 3&quot; LCD and a few other upgrades, but these upgrades don&#8217;t add up when the picture is taken and the quality of both cameras match alike. I may have chosen the XSI if I wanted to spend the extra $150. u.s but for the lesser price, I&#8217;m yet to regret.<br />
3- &quot;The XS &quot;only has a 2.5&quot; LCD compared to a couple of it&#8217;s rivals having 3&quot; LCD&#8217;s&quot;. I can see every thing clearly with this screen, even with Histograms, and grids onscreen. If LCD&#8217;s get much bigger then canon may need to install a tv tuner as well&#8230;.the 2.5&quot; is more than sufficient.<br />
4- &quot;The XS doesn&#8217;t have SPOT METERING compared to the XSi, so this is a big issue&quot;- haven&#8217;t encountered a r<br /><b>References : </b><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CBKJGG?tag=dcmb-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CBKJGG?tag=dcmb-20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buying my first Digital SLR? by Mark</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>The D40 is an excellent camera and it seems to be discontinued and replaced by the Nikon D3000 (see 1st link below) and presently the D3000 is about $480 (prices fluctuate quite a bit).

If you do get a D40, it should cost less, especially if it is used or refurbished.  Adorama Camera sells used and refurbished cameras. (see 2nd link below).

I added some other seller links so you can see what are deals on the D40 or maybe the D3000.  Some of these website have customer reviews that can be very informative.

I think you will be happy with either camera, I would not get the D40 if it is going to cost more than the D3000. 

Hope this helps.

Mark

marksablow.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond3000/ 

http://www.adorama.com/INKD40KR.html 

http://www.buydig.com/shop/home.aspx 

http://www.amazon.com/ 

http://www.keh.com/ 

http://www.calumetphoto.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D40 is an excellent camera and it seems to be discontinued and replaced by the Nikon D3000 (see 1st link below) and presently the D3000 is about $480 (prices fluctuate quite a bit).</p>
<p>If you do get a D40, it should cost less, especially if it is used or refurbished.  Adorama Camera sells used and refurbished cameras. (see 2nd link below).</p>
<p>I added some other seller links so you can see what are deals on the D40 or maybe the D3000.  Some of these website have customer reviews that can be very informative.</p>
<p>I think you will be happy with either camera, I would not get the D40 if it is going to cost more than the D3000. </p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
<p>marksablow.com<br /><b>References : </b><br /><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond3000/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond3000/</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.adorama.com/INKD40KR.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adorama.com/INKD40KR.html</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.buydig.com/shop/home.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.buydig.com/shop/home.aspx</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.keh.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.keh.com/</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.calumetphoto.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.calumetphoto.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buying my first Digital SLR? by DigitalPhotography</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalPhotography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/buying-my-first-digital-slr#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Go for it, it's cheap and good. Almost all DSLRs are good, D40 too! Don't worry about 6 mega pixels, because that is enough for viewing on a monitor and printing relatively big. The camera is great for beginners and you'll have more money for lenses. When you realize what you REALLY miss on your camera, then you upgrade. 

Good luck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Go for it, it&#8217;s cheap and good. Almost all DSLRs are good, D40 too! Don&#8217;t worry about 6 mega pixels, because that is enough for viewing on a monitor and printing relatively big. The camera is great for beginners and you&#8217;ll have more money for lenses. When you realize what you REALLY miss on your camera, then you upgrade. </p>
<p>Good luck.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What are some good digital SLR camera&#8217;s to review? by George Y</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/what-are-some-good-digital-slr-cameras-to-review#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>George Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/what-are-some-good-digital-slr-cameras-to-review#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>Let this be a starting place for your research.
http://www.jdpower.com/electronics/ratings/digital_camera/dslr

Then, here's a site with very detailed reviews and comparisions of digital cameras.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/default.asp?view=rating

I hope this is helpful for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amateur &#38; professional photographer for 45+ years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let this be a starting place for your research.<br />
<a href="http://www.jdpower.com/electronics/ratings/digital_camera/dslr" rel="nofollow">http://www.jdpower.com/electronics/ratings/digital_camera/dslr</a></p>
<p>Then, here&#8217;s a site with very detailed reviews and comparisions of digital cameras.<br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/default.asp?view=rating" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/default.asp?view=rating</a></p>
<p>I hope this is helpful for you.<br /><b>References : </b><br />Amateur &amp; professional photographer for 45+ years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What are some good digital SLR camera&#8217;s to review? by fhotoace</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/what-are-some-good-digital-slr-cameras-to-review#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>fhotoace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/digital-slr-reviews/what-are-some-good-digital-slr-cameras-to-review#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>I can only recommend Nikon's and Canon's because they are the two companies that the pros use.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&#38;cameras=nikon_d40x%2Ccanon_eos400d&#38;show=all

From Ken Rockwell

http://kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm

http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;DigiPro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only recommend Nikon&#8217;s and Canon&#8217;s because they are the two companies that the pros use.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&amp;cameras=nikon_d40x%2Ccanon_eos400d&amp;show=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&amp;cameras=nikon_d40x%2Ccanon_eos400d&amp;show=all</a></p>
<p>From Ken Rockwell</p>
<p><a href="http://kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm" rel="nofollow">http://kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm" rel="nofollow">http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm" rel="nofollow">http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm</a><br /><b>References : </b><br />DigiPro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on what was the first canon digital slr? by Steve P</title>
		<link>http://digitalslrreviews.net/canon-digital-slr/what-was-the-first-canon-digital-slr#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalslrreviews.net/canon-digital-slr/what-was-the-first-canon-digital-slr#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was going to say there was some Canon Kodak hybrid work, but the D30 was the &#34;real&#34; first Canon DSLR. I never bought that, but I do have their second DSLR, the D60. The 6 megapixels was an unheard of high number in the day. Other cameras typically had nothing higher than 3 MP, many only with 1.5 or 2 MP.

steve&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was going to say there was some Canon Kodak hybrid work, but the D30 was the &quot;real&quot; first Canon DSLR. I never bought that, but I do have their second DSLR, the D60. The 6 megapixels was an unheard of high number in the day. Other cameras typically had nothing higher than 3 MP, many only with 1.5 or 2 MP.</p>
<p>steve<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
